What Is the Statute of Limitations for Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania?

Posted On: March 27, 2026

Facebook
LinkedIn
X

Pennsylvania law generally gives patients two years to file a medical malpractice lawsuit under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2), subject to doctrines and statutes that may affect when that period begins or how it applies in particular cases. The discovery rule can delay accrual when an injury and its causal connection to negligence were not reasonably knowable, and minors generally receive tolling protection under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5533. In Yanakos v. UPMC (2019), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held the MCARE Act’s seven-year statute of repose unconstitutional in Section 1303.513(a), eliminating that repose bar for the claims at issue there.

At Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C., New Castle medical malpractice attorneys Lawrence M. Kelly and Joseph A. George represent patients throughout Lawrence County and Western Pennsylvania who have been harmed by medical negligence. Our personal injury lawyers bring decades of trial experience and a commitment to holding healthcare providers accountable when their conduct falls below the standard of care.

This guide explains Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations, how the discovery rule works, what happens when the patient is a minor, what the Yanakos v. UPMC decision means for your case, and what steps to take to protect your right to compensation. Call Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. at (724) 658-8535 to speak with Lawrence M. Kelly or Joseph A. George about your medical malpractice claim.

How Long Do You Have to Sue a Doctor in Pennsylvania?

Pennsylvania’s statute of limitations for medical malpractice is two years. Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2), patients must file a lawsuit within two years from the date the alleged malpractice occurred. This deadline applies to claims against all licensed healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, hospitals, dentists, and other medical professionals.

The two-year clock typically begins on the date of the negligent act. For example, if a surgeon operates on the wrong site on March 1, 2025, the patient would need to file suit by March 1, 2027. Missing this deadline generally bars the claim permanently, regardless of how strong the evidence may be.

However, the start date is not always straightforward. Some injuries are not immediately apparent, and the law accounts for that through the discovery rule, which is discussed below.

What Happens If You Miss the Deadline?

Courts in Pennsylvania enforce the statute of limitations strictly. If a patient files a lawsuit after the two-year period expires, the court will typically dismiss the case. This applies even when the medical error is well documented and the injuries are severe. Because of this, seeking legal advice as soon as you suspect something went wrong with your medical care is important.

What Is the Discovery Rule in Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Cases?

The discovery rule is one of the most important exceptions to the two-year statute of limitations. Under this rule, the two-year clock does not start on the date of the medical error. Instead, it begins on the date the patient discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the injury and its connection to medical negligence.

This exception exists because many forms of medical malpractice are not immediately obvious. A misread diagnostic image, a failure to report abnormal lab results, or an internal surgical complication may go undetected for months or even years. The discovery rule ensures that patients who could not reasonably have known about the harm are not unfairly barred from seeking compensation.

How Courts Evaluate the Discovery Rule

Pennsylvania courts place a burden on the patient to show that the injury was not reasonably discoverable within the standard two-year period. The question is not whether the patient actually knew about the malpractice, but whether a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have known. Courts expect patients to exercise reasonable diligence in investigating their medical care when warning signs appear.

For instance, if a patient experiences persistent, unexplained pain after a procedure and waits several years to investigate, a court may find that the symptoms should have prompted an earlier inquiry. On the other hand, if a retained surgical instrument causes no symptoms until years later, the discovery rule would likely extend the filing deadline.

Key Takeaway: The discovery rule may extend the two-year deadline by starting the clock when the patient first knew or should have known about the medical error and resulting injury. Patients must still act with reasonable diligence once warning signs appear.

Lawrence M. Kelly of Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can evaluate when the discovery rule may apply to your situation. Call (724) 658-8535 for a free consultation.

Medical Malpractice Attorney in New Castle – Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.

Smiling man in suit with striped tie.

Lawrence M. Kelly, Esq.

Lawrence M. Kelly is a partner at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. and a Board Certified Civil Trial Specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He earned his J.D. cum laude from the University of Akron School of Law in 1983 and has been practicing in Pennsylvania for more than 40 years. He is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Kelly served as a member of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania from 2013 to 2018 and is President of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice (2024).

Kelly has been recognized as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer every year from 2006 through 2026 and has been named to the Top 50 Pittsburgh Super Lawyers list from 2019 through 2026. He holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and has received the Champion of Justice Award from the Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association (2025).

Joseph A. George

Joseph A. George, Esq.

Joseph A. George earned his J.D. from Duquesne University School of Law in 1996. He is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. His practice areas include medical malpractice, motor vehicle accidents, personal injury, and workers’ compensation.

George has been named to Pennsylvania Super Lawyers from 2018 through 2025 and holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He has been recognized as a National Trial Lawyers Top 100 attorney. He became a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation in 2024.

Does the Statute of Limitations Apply Differently for Children in Pennsylvania?

Yes. Pennsylvania provides special protections for minors who are victims of medical malpractice. Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5533, the two-year statute of limitations does not begin to run until the child turns 18. This means a minor has until their 20th birthday to file a medical malpractice claim.

This tolling provision recognizes that children cannot independently pursue legal claims. If a parent or guardian does not file a lawsuit on the child’s behalf during childhood, the child still retains the right to take legal action as an adult.

For example, if a doctor commits a surgical error on a 10-year-old patient, the child would have until age 20 to file a malpractice lawsuit. However, if the child’s parent or guardian is aware of the injury, it is generally advisable to pursue the claim sooner, while evidence and witness testimony are still fresh.

What Did the Yanakos v. UPMC Decision Change About the Filing Deadline?

The 2019 Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Yanakos v. UPMC eliminated the seven-year statute of repose that previously applied to medical malpractice claims. Before this ruling, the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act (MCARE Act) under 40 P.S. § 1303.513 prohibited patients from filing lawsuits more than seven years after the date of the alleged malpractice, regardless of when the injury was discovered.

The case involved a family that sued the UPMC and two physicians in 2015 over a liver transplant performed in 2003. The hospital argued that the seven-year repose period barred the claim. In a 4-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the statute of repose violated the Open Courts provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Article I, Section 11), which guarantees every person a legal remedy for injuries.

What This Means for Patients Today

Because the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held the MCARE Act’s seven-year statute of repose unconstitutional in Yanakos, Pennsylvania medical malpractice plaintiffs are no longer barred by that specific seven-year repose period. Even so, claim timing still depends on the applicable statute of limitations and doctrines such as the discovery rule, and wrongful death and survival claims remain subject to the separate timing rule in Section 1303.513(d).

This is particularly significant for cases involving:

  • Misdiagnosed or undiagnosed conditions that progress silently
  • Retained surgical instruments that were not discovered for years
  • Genetic testing errors, as in the Yanakos case itself
  • Delayed complications from surgical procedures

Attorneys Lawrence M. Kelly and Joseph A. George at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can help determine how the Yanakos ruling affects your potential claim. Call (724) 658-8535 today.

What Is a Certificate of Merit and Why Does It Matter?

Pennsylvania law requires an additional step before a medical malpractice lawsuit can move forward. Under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure (Pa.R.C.P.) 1042.3, the plaintiff must file a Certificate of Merit (COM) with the complaint or within 60 days after the complaint is filed.

The Certificate of Merit is a filing required by Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3. It must be signed by the plaintiff’s attorney, or by the plaintiff if unrepresented, and it must certify one of the rule’s permitted bases for proceeding, including that an appropriate licensed professional has supplied a written statement that there is a reasonable probability the defendant’s conduct fell outside acceptable professional standards and caused harm, that the claim against a defendant is based solely on vicarious liability, or that expert testimony is unnecessary for prosecution of the claim. A separate certificate is generally required for each licensed professional against whom a professional liability claim is asserted.

Why the 60-Day Deadline Matters

Courts enforce the COM requirement strictly. If a plaintiff fails to file the certificate within 60 days, the defendant may seek a judgment of non pros, which can result in dismissal of the case. While courts may grant extensions for good cause, those extensions are not automatic.

The COM does not prove malpractice by itself. It serves as a procedural safeguard to screen out claims that lack medical support. However, failure to comply with this requirement can end a case before it reaches the merits.

Can You File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit After a Patient Dies in Pennsylvania?

Yes. Pennsylvania law allows surviving family members to file wrongful death and survival actions when medical malpractice causes a patient’s death. However, the statute of limitations for these claims differs from the standard two-year personal injury deadline.

Under the MCARE Act, Section 1303.513(d), wrongful death and survival actions based on medical malpractice must be filed within two years after the date of the patient’s death. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court clarified this timeline in Dubose v. Quinlan (2017), holding that the general personal injury statute of limitations does not apply to wrongful death and survival actions in malpractice cases. Instead, the specific MCARE Act provision controls.

Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim?

Pennsylvania’s wrongful death statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8301, provides that the action is ordinarily brought by the personal representative to recover for the spouse, children, or parents of the deceased. If no action is brought by the personal representative within six months after death, those beneficiaries may bring the action themselves as trustees ad litem.

Does Fraudulent Concealment Extend the Filing Deadline?

Yes. Pennsylvania recognizes the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, which can toll the statute of limitations when a defendant’s fraud or concealment causes the plaintiff to relax vigilance or deviate from the right of inquiry. The doctrine does not require fraud in the strictest sense; Pennsylvania courts have explained that it can include unintentional deception. Even when tolling applies, the plaintiff still must act with reasonable diligence once the facts are or should be discovered.

This exception applies when the defendant actively misleads the patient about the quality of care they received. For example, if a surgeon knows that an error occurred during an operation but assures the patient that the procedure went well, the statute of limitations may not begin to run until the patient discovers the truth.

Fraudulent concealment requires more than silence or a failure to disclose. The patient must typically show that the healthcare provider took affirmative steps to hide the malpractice. Courts evaluate these claims on a case-by-case basis.

What Steps Should You Take to Protect Your Medical Malpractice Claim?

Acting quickly after you suspect medical negligence is essential. The statute of limitations can expire faster than many patients realize, and building a strong case takes time. Consider the following steps to protect your rights.

  • Seek follow-up medical care. If you believe a medical error has harmed you, prioritize your health first. Get a second opinion and document any new diagnoses, treatments, or complications. These records can serve as critical evidence in a malpractice claim.
  • Request your complete medical records. Under Pennsylvania law, you have the right to obtain copies of your medical records. Ask for records from every provider involved in your care, including hospital records, physician notes, lab results, and diagnostic imaging. Complete documentation allows a medical expert to evaluate your case accurately.
  • Consult a medical malpractice attorney. Because of Pennsylvania’s strict deadlines, including the two-year statute of limitations and the 60-day Certificate of Merit requirement, early legal consultation is important. An attorney can coordinate the expert review process while the evidence is still available and witness memories are fresh.
  • Do not delay filing. Even if you are unsure whether malpractice occurred, it is better to consult with an attorney and determine your options before the deadline passes. Once the statute of limitations expires, the right to seek compensation is typically lost permanently.

Key Takeaway: Protecting a medical malpractice claim in Pennsylvania requires prompt action. Request medical records, seek follow-up care, and consult an attorney well before the two-year deadline to ensure compliance with the statute of limitations and Certificate of Merit requirements.

Lawrence M. Kelly at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can review your case and explain your legal options. Call (724) 658-8535 for a free consultation.

What Types of Damages Can You Recover in a Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Case?

Pennsylvania does not cap compensatory damages in medical malpractice cases filed against private healthcare providers. This means injured patients may seek full compensation for both economic and non-economic losses.

Economic Damages

Economic damages cover the measurable financial impact of the medical error. These may include past and future medical expenses related to corrective treatment, lost wages if the injury prevented you from working, reduced earning capacity if the injury limits your future ability to work, and rehabilitation or long-term care costs.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages account for losses that are real but harder to quantify. These typically include physical pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium (the impact on the patient’s relationship with their spouse).

Punitive Damages and Government Claims

Pennsylvania permits punitive damages in limited cases, but the MCARE Act provides that, except in cases alleging intentional misconduct, punitive damages against an individual physician may not exceed 200% of the compensatory damages awarded. Separate sovereign-immunity limits may apply in claims against Commonwealth parties: under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8528, damages generally may not exceed $250,000 in favor of any one plaintiff or $1,000,000 in the aggregate arising from the same occurrence.

Damage Type What It Covers Cap in Pennsylvania
Economic Damages Medical bills, lost wages, future care costs No cap (private defendants)
Non-Economic Damages Pain, suffering, emotional distress No cap (private defendants)
Punitive Damages Awarded for outrageous conduct 2x compensatory damages
Government Defendants Claims are subject to Pennsylvania’s sovereign immunity limits $250,000 per plaintiff; $1,000,000 aggregate per occurrence

Key Takeaway: Pennsylvania does not cap compensatory damages in most medical malpractice cases. Patients may recover economic damages (medical bills, lost wages), non-economic damages (pain and suffering), and, in rare cases, punitive damages capped at two times the compensatory award.

Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. can assess the potential value of your medical malpractice claim. Call (724) 658-8535 for a free case evaluation.

A medical error can change the course of your life. Whether the harm resulted from a surgical mistake, a misdiagnosis, or a failure to follow up on test results, you deserve to understand your legal options before the filing deadline passes. Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations is strictly enforced, and delays can permanently bar your right to seek compensation.

Lawrence M. Kelly and Joseph A. George of Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. have represented injured patients throughout Lawrence County, Allegheny County, and Butler County for decades. Our firm handles medical malpractice claims at the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas at 430 Court Street in New Castle and in courts across Western Pennsylvania. Our medical malpractice lawyers coordinate the expert review, Certificate of Merit filing, and litigation process so you can focus on your recovery.

Call Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. at (724) 658-8535 for a free consultation. Our main office is located at 315 N Mercer St, New Castle, PA 16101, with additional offices in Ellwood City, Beaver Falls, Butler, Cranberry Township, and Pittsburgh. Let our team review your case and explain the next steps.

It All Starts Here

Schedule a Free Consultation

We only work with clients and cases we truly believe in, we take your case because we genuinely believe in both you and your case’s importance.

Related Articles

December 3, 2025

Motorcycle riders in Pennsylvania enjoy unique freedom on the road, but this comes with specific legal responsibilities. Pennsylvania’s motorcycle laws outline essential safety standards, licensing requirements, and guidelines for proper insurance coverage, issues especially important…

April 16, 2025

Discovering that a loved one has suffered a fall in a nursing home can be a profoundly distressing experience. When an elderly family member is injured under the care of a facility that is meant…

November 12, 2025

You may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits if you are injured on the job, and weekly payouts may be available depending on your case. Many Americans have found they need more than one job…