We've Recovered Over 200 Million Dollars for Our Clients.
A crash can leave you facing mounting medical bills and lost wages when the at-fault driver lacks insurance or carries only Pennsylvania’s $15,000 minimum liability coverage. Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage in Pennsylvania pays the difference between the at-fault driver’s limits and the true value of your injury claim. Pursuing a UM/UIM claim involves seeking compensation directly from your own insurance company and enforcing a contract against the carrier.
UM and UIM benefits commonly apply after the following events:
Securing benefits from an insurance company requires a direct legal approach. Partners Lawrence M. Kelly and Joseph A. George lead Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. in handling these first-party disputes. Our car accident attorneys apply more than 90 years of combined personal injury litigation experience to hold carriers accountable to their written contracts. Since 1933, our firm has represented injured clients throughout Western Pennsylvania with thorough case preparation and trial-ready advocacy.
The guide below explains the differences between UM and UIM coverage, how stacked and unstacked policies impact payouts, and the common mistakes that can compromise a claim. It also outlines how to document damages, what to expect during arbitration or litigation, and the strict filing deadlines you must meet. If a carrier issues a claim denial or a low settlement offer, our attorneys can review the policy and take action on your behalf. Call Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. at (724) 658-8535 for a free consultation.
It All Starts Here
Schedule a Free Consultation
We only work with clients and cases we truly believe in, we take your case because we genuinely believe in both you and your case’s importance.
Our Attorneys Go
the Extra Mile
Long Standing Reputation, Personalized Attention
Unique Plaintiff and Defense Experience
Over 10,000 Clients have trusted LGKG… There Must Be a Reason Why?
Great experience and extremely professional and knowledgeable company and staff. Mr George, Mr Mack, and Ms Kelly were very dedicated and focused on my case and made me feel that…
Mark L.
LGKG are an amazing group who will do everything in their power for their clients. They helped me through a really rough time in my life and I would highly recommend them to everyone…
Dana Rhodes
Attorney Joe George and his team are a phenomenal group to have in your corner. They explained everything about the process and decisions, making it as stress-free as possible. Mr…
Glenda Jennings
LGKG has represented me for the past couple accidents that I’ve been in (both hit and runs, crazy I know) and they are very client oriented. Gianna is fantastic and I would recomm…
Tony Gaus
All of the staff I encountered at their office were very pleasant to deal with. Gianna handled my settlement case and she made it all very seamless from start to finish. She kept m…
Tommy Vargo
I cannot give enough praise for attorneys Lauren Kelly Gielarowski and Matt Mangino at the LGKG law practice. Lauren and Matt were able to explain an extremely complicated medica…
Jody Melto
I have to say that I couldn’t have received any better service. Everyone from the receptionist all the way up to the attorneys were absolutely so accommodating. I worked most dire…
Cindy Biddle
Schedule a Free Consultation
Lawyers Are Standing By
Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage is first-party insurance on an auto policy that pays for bodily injury losses when the at-fault driver lacks sufficient limits. This coverage pays for the same categories of damages as a standard liability claim. Recoverable losses include medical expenses, wage loss, and pain and suffering if the policyholder carries full tort or meets a limited tort exception. Since the funds come from the claimant’s own carrier, the claim is governed by the policy contract and the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law at 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1731.
The claimant must prove the other driver was negligent and that the crash caused the injuries. The insurer then assumes the position of the at-fault driver for payment purposes and can raise the same defenses, including comparative negligence and disputes over the extent of the injuries.
Uninsured motorist coverage applies when the at-fault driver has no bodily injury liability insurance. Under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1702, an uninsured motor vehicle also includes a vehicle whose insurer denies coverage or becomes insolvent. The law also covers an unidentified vehicle in a hit-and-run collision provided the crash is reported to the police and the claimant notifies their insurer within 30 days or as soon as practicable.
Underinsured motorist coverage applies when the at-fault driver has liability insurance that is insufficient to cover the full extent of the losses. Pennsylvania sets a minimum bodily injury limit of $15,000 per person, and a single hospital stay can quickly exhaust that amount. UIM pays the excess damages up to the policy’s limits after the underlying liability policy is paid or tendered. Unlike a UM claim, a UIM claim requires the claimant to settle the underlying liability claim first. Most insurance policies require written consent from the UIM carrier before a claimant accepts that initial settlement.
| Factor | UM Coverage | UIM Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| At-fault driver's insurance | None, denied, or insolvent | Valid but insufficient |
| Hit-and-run applies | Yes | No |
| Liability policy exhausted first | No | Yes, in most policies |
| Carrier consent before settling | Not applicable | Yes, in most policies |
| Damages recoverable | Bodily injury losses | Bodily injury losses above liability limits |
Key Takeaway: UM coverage pays when the at-fault driver has no insurance or cannot be identified, while UIM pays the difference when that driver’s liability limits are too low to cover the injuries.
Pennsylvania does not require drivers to carry UM/UIM coverage, but insurers must offer it. Under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1731, every auto liability policy issued in the state includes uninsured and underinsured motorist benefits unless the named insured signs a separate written rejection form for each coverage. These forms must follow strict wording and signature requirements.
If a rejection form fails to comply with the statutory language, signature, or dating requirements, courts invalidate the rejection and apply the coverage at the liability limits. Reviewing the signed forms in the underwriting file serves as a primary step in evaluating a UM/UIM claim.
Policyholders can also choose to carry UM/UIM limits lower than their liability limits. Under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1734, a named insured can submit a written request for lower limits down to the state minimum of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident. Policyholders often forget signing this reduction request, so verifying the signed form is necessary before accepting the carrier’s stated limits as final.
Highly recommended. Gianna Kelly of Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.assisted me after I suffered an accident in a retail outlet. The professional and sensible advice was outs…
Regis Rothrauff
I hired Atty Larry Kelly to help me with a workers comp case and let me tell you that he MORE than helped. He knows the law and knew of a precedent set a few years back and was ab…
Donna Zaczyk
I am beyond happy and blessed for my attorneys Gianna & Lawrence Kelly! They handled my case with professionalism and grace!!!! I really appreciate y’all both! I highly recommend…
Charina Johnson
I am so happy with my decision to have Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George handle my case. Both Larry and Gianna were beyond helpful and on top of my case, they answered any question…
Star Blontz
Would highly recommend. Attorney Gianna Kelly is super friendly and easy to talk to while at the same time staying professional and keeping me updated on all the processes and upd…
Michelle Delph
Joe George was my attorney after a car accident. I cannot say enough about how much he and his staff took care of my case. He was super friendly, caring and honest. If I ever need…
Susan Luce
Attorney Joe George and Attorney Sam Mack Honesty. Integrity. Transparency. Professional. Personable. I experienced this and so much more when working with Attorney George and Att…
Kristina Johnson
UM and UIM coverage applies when another driver’s negligence causes bodily injury and that driver lacks sufficient liability insurance. Common triggers in Lawrence County crashes include hit-and-run collisions, phantom vehicle incidents where an unidentified driver forces a vehicle off the road without physical contact, and multi-vehicle crashes where multiple injured parties exhaust a small liability policy.
Coverage is not limited to crashes in the policyholder’s own car. Depending on specific policy terms, coverage can protect you as a passenger in another vehicle, as a pedestrian, as a bicyclist, or as a resident relative under a family member’s policy. In chain-reaction crashes, the order of impact determines which liability policies pay out before UIM benefits come into play.
Phantom vehicle claims require prompt action. Reporting the crash to the police, obtaining the incident number, and notifying the insurer in writing within 30 days preserves the right to recover benefits. Corroborating evidence, including witness statements, dashcam footage, or physical vehicle damage, strengthens a claim when the fleeing driver is never identified.
Key Takeaway: UM and UIM coverage triggers when a negligent driver is uninsured, underinsured, or unidentified, protecting individuals as drivers, passengers, pedestrians, or resident relatives under a household policy.
Notice provided within the first month often determines the outcome of hit-and-run and phantom vehicle claims. Call (724) 658-8535 to discuss a UM/UIM claim in Lawrence County.
Stacking determines how many times a policyholder can apply UM/UIM limits to a single crash. Pennsylvania law under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1738 makes stacking the default option, requiring an insured who wants to waive it to sign a separate statutory waiver form.
Stacked coverage multiplies the per-person limit by the number of insured vehicles on a policy and can allow recovery across separate household policies. A $100,000 UIM limit on a policy insuring three vehicles provides $300,000 in total available coverage. Intra-policy stacking combines vehicles insured under a single policy, while inter-policy stacking reaches additional policies within the same household.
Insurers have attempted to defeat stacking through household vehicle exclusions. In Gallagher v. GEICO Indemnity Co., 201 A.3d 131 (Pa. 2019), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that a household vehicle exclusion functioned as an unsigned de facto waiver of stacking and was unenforceable. If a carrier cites a household exclusion to deny coverage, that decision may be subject to legal challenge.
Unstacked coverage caps recovery at a single per-person limit regardless of how many vehicles are insured. Insurance carriers favor unstacked coverage to limit payout exposure, while offering premium discounts that are small compared to the coverage given up. A waiver binds a policyholder only if it satisfies the form and signature requirements set forth in Section 1738, making verification of the signed document necessary.
| Policy Structure | How Limits Apply | $100,000 Limit, 3 Vehicles | Written Waiver Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacked | Limit multiplies per insured vehicle | $300,000 available | No, it is the default |
| Unstacked | One limit for the entire policy | $100,000 available | Yes, statutory form required |
The process begins by notifying your insurance carrier in writing about a potential claim, even while determining whether the at-fault driver carries sufficient coverage. Insurers frequently assert late notice as a defense against paying benefits, making early written notification a vital protective measure.
The claim proceeds through the following steps:
First-party medical benefits, health insurance subrogation liens, and Act 6 statutory medical billing reductions directly affect the net settlement recovery. Act 6 limits what medical providers can charge for treatment following an auto accident. Resolving all health insurance and provider liens before executing a final settlement release prevents unexpected repayment deductions from your recovery.
Lawrence M. Kelly, Esq., is a partner at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. and has practiced with the firm for more than 40 years. A lifelong member of the New Castle community, his practice focuses on personal injury and workers’ compensation. He is also board certified in civil trial law by the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Mr. Kelly has served as past president of the Western Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association and as president of the Pennsylvania Association for Justice in 2024. His approach centers on strong client advocacy and pursuing outcomes that benefit the people he represents.
Joseph A. George, Esq., is a partner at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. whose practice includes motor vehicle accidents, personal injury claims, medical malpractice, and workers’ compensation matters. He earned his J.D. from the Duquesne University School of Law in 1996 and is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
Mr. George emphasizes careful preparation in his legal work and aims to enter the courtroom fully prepared for each case. His professional recognition includes Pennsylvania Super Lawyers from 2018 through 2025 and an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
Reach Out to Us
Schedule a Free Consultation
Having represented over 10,000 clients, we’ve brought more cases to trial than many attorneys in Western PA
Larry Kelly is amazing! He always there to answer any questions and gets back to you asap. He would be the first attorney I would call and he should be your first as well! Best ex…
Chelsea Goldstrom
Joe George was extremely helpful and I couldn’t recommend him more. We had a very sensitive issue and he was honest, gave great advice, and helped my family navigate a win. Really…
Brandy Holland
My husband was in a motorcycle accident. We went to see Luxenberg Garnett Kelly & George. We met with Gianna Kelly. She went through everything with us and they helped us out a lo…
Patricia Sager
The service that was provided couldnt have been more professional. Giana handled everything in a timely manner and my case was resolved without delay. Thank you and I would defini…
Vincent Canzano
My experience with LGKG was fantastic. I dealt with Larry Kelly and Sam Mack. They could not have been more helpful, professional and kind. They were very supportive the entire ti…
Susan Karidis
I have had to use LGKG law offices on two occasions. On both times the attorneys and their staff were the the best. The attorneys are always at the top of the game when it comes t…
Gina Denucci
Lauren and Larry were amazing in helping my friend Amanda with her personal injury case. Great representation and treated everyone like family. Thank you both…
Kenny Neely
It All Starts Here
Schedule a Free Consultation
We only work with clients and cases we truly believe in, we take your case because we genuinely believe in both you and your case’s importance.
You can bring a lawsuit against your own insurer, but the specific legal forum depends on your policy terms. Many Pennsylvania policies contain binding arbitration clauses covering UM/UIM claims, while policies without an arbitration clause require filing a breach of contract action in the local Court of Common Pleas where you reside or where the collision occurred.
The legal scope in either forum remains narrow, focusing primarily on whether the at-fault driver was negligent and the overall monetary value of your damages. Pure legal coverage issues, such as stacking eligibility, household exclusions, and the validity of rejection forms, are decided by a judge rather than an arbitration panel.
When a policy requires arbitration, the standard procedure utilizes a three-arbitrator panel where each side selects one representative, and those two arbitrators select a neutral third. This panel reviews medical evidence and hears testimony, issuing a binding majority decision up to policy limits. Certain policies allow appeals for awards exceeding a specified monetary threshold, making contract review critical before initiating the process.
Cases filed directly in court with damages below specific county thresholds may go through compulsory judicial arbitration under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. This court-annexed process includes the right to appeal for a trial de novo, distinguishing it from private contractual arbitration.
Key Takeaway: Policy language determines whether a UM/UIM dispute resolves through a three-arbitrator panel or in the Court of Common Pleas, requiring a careful contract review before submitting a demand.
A denial or low settlement offer constitutes a breach of contract and can support a bad faith claim. Under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 8371, a court that finds an insurer acted in bad faith can award interest on the claim at the prime rate plus 3 percent, punitive damages, court costs, and attorney fees. Establishing bad faith requires clear and convincing evidence that the insurer lacked a reasonable basis for denying benefits and knew of or recklessly disregarded that lack of reasonable basis.
Insurers rely on several tactics to minimize claim payouts. Common strategies include using automated software estimates instead of reviewing medical records, attributing injuries to pre-existing degenerative conditions, arguing the collision was too minor to cause physical harm, alleging late notice, and invoking policy exclusions that courts have already restricted.
Detailed documentation tracking every request, response, and unexplained delay separates a standard negotiation from a provable bad faith case. Maintaining written correspondence and avoiding recorded statements without an attorney present protects your rights throughout the process.
Errors made early in the process can weaken a claim, often occurring before an injured party recognizes that an insurer’s financial interests differ from their own.
Common mistakes that compromise a UM/UIM recovery include:
Two distinct deadlines apply when pursuing recovery after a crash. The claim against the negligent driver is a personal injury tort claim subject to a two-year statute of limitations under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 5524. The claim against an insurer for UM or UIM benefits is a contract action governed by a four-year statute of limitations under 42 Pa.C.S. Section 5525.
This four-year contract period does not automatically begin on the date of the collision. Under Erie Insurance Exchange v. Bristol, 174 A.3d 578 (Pa. 2017), the limitations period on a UIM claim begins when the insurer breaches the policy by denying coverage or refusing to proceed to arbitration. Prompt notice remains important under auto policies, as missing the two-year tort deadline against the at-fault driver can compromise the underlying UIM claim.
Different timing rules apply to wrongful death actions, survival claims, claims involving minors, and actions against government entities. Identifying the applicable deadlines early protects your right to full financial recovery.
Pursuing a UM/UIM claim places an insured in an adversarial position with their own insurance company, making full recovery dependent on thorough contract analysis. Examining the declarations page, full policy contract, rejection forms, stacking waivers, and underwriting file can reveal additional coverage not reflected in an insurer’s initial evaluation.
Our attorneys bring more than 90 years of combined personal injury litigation experience to first-party disputes, having represented clients across Western Pennsylvania since 1933. Familiarity with local arbitrators, defense counsel, and court tendencies across Lawrence County and surrounding jurisdictions helps guide effective settlement demands and decision-making.
We represent injured individuals throughout Lawrence, Mercer, Butler, Beaver, Allegheny, Crawford, Venango, and Armstrong Counties. Our firm handles UM/UIM claims on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we secure financial recovery for your claim.
Key Takeaway: Local legal counsel can improve claim outcomes by uncovering unlisted policy coverage and evaluating damages against regional arbitration awards and jury verdicts in Western Pennsylvania.
Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. represents UM/UIM claimants throughout Pennsylvania. We handle claims for drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists in New Castle, across Lawrence County, and in the surrounding communities of Western Pennsylvania, including Ellwood City, Neshannock, Union Township, and New Wilmington. We also accept UM/UIM and auto injury cases from Allegheny County and Butler County, as well as from clients elsewhere in Pennsylvania whose crash or policy has a connection to our courts.
Our Family is Here to Help Yours
Policyholders pay premiums for uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage to protect against uncompensated injury losses. When an insurer disputes fault, questions necessary medical care, or offers a fraction of what an injury costs, resolving the claim requires thorough legal preparation.
Partners Lawrence M. Kelly and Joseph A. George lead Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. in handling UM/UIM disputes throughout Pennsylvania, including hit-and-run collisions, phantom vehicle claims, policy stacking disputes, and bad faith actions. Our attorneys examine the policy and underwriting files, identify all policies that may apply, compile medical and wage loss evidence, and press the claim through arbitration or the Court of Common Pleas when an offer fails to reflect the damages.
Call (724) 658-8535 for a free consultation regarding your claim. Located at 315 N Mercer St, New Castle, PA 16101, our firm represents clients in New Castle, Lawrence County, and across Western Pennsylvania on a contingency fee basis.
No. Insurers must offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, but a named insured can reject it by signing separate written rejection forms prescribed under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1731. If a rejection form fails to meet statutory requirements, courts invalidate the rejection and apply the coverage.
Uninsured motorist coverage applies when the at-fault driver lacks liability insurance entirely or flees the scene without being identified. Underinsured motorist coverage pays the difference when the negligent driver carries liability insurance, but policy limits are insufficient to cover total crash damages.
Yes. The law outlines stacking as the standard option under 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1738, which multiplies the per-person limit by the amount of vehicles on the policy. Waiving this feature requires a specific statutory form, and judges have struck down waivers failing to meet exact legal standards.
That situation creates a UIM claim. The injured party resolves the liability claim by exhausting the at-fault driver’s policy limits, obtains written consent from the UIM carrier before executing a liability release, and then pursues remaining damages under UIM coverage.
Arbitration requirements depend on specific policy language. When a policy includes a valid arbitration clause, a three-arbitrator panel resolves the dispute. If the policy lacks an arbitration clause, an injured party files a breach of contract lawsuit in the Court of Common Pleas.
Claimants have two years to file a tort lawsuit against the negligent driver under the personal injury statute of limitations. A four-year statute of limitations applies to the contract claim against the insurance carrier, with the four-year timeline beginning when the insurer breaches the contract rather than on the collision date. Insurance policies also independently require prompt notification following a crash.
